It is therefore right and proper to draw the attention of the non-scientific public to the disagreements about evolution. But some recent remarks of evolutionists show that they think this unreasonable. This situation, where scientific men rally to the defense of a doctrine they are unable to define, much less demonstrate with scientific rigour, attempting to maintain its credit with the public by the suppression of criticisms and the elimination of difficulties, is abnormal and undesirable in science. — W.R. Thompson, Preface to the 1959 Darwin Centennial edition of "On the Origin of Species"
I love your work. I check in nearly every day. — an associate pastor in California who works with college grad students
When the path towards progress in a field becomes muddied, the best response may be to step away from all the technical specifics that make up day-to-day practice and begin pulling up the floorboards. In other words, rather than continuing to push on the science, it may be best to ask about the unspoken philosophies supporting that research effort. — Adam Frank, NPR 13.7 Cosmos & Culture 6/28/16
How do you make glass that bends without breaking? Learn from a lowly sponge. Then look around for other ideas.
When you take the “bio” out of astrobiology, what do you get? Is it still a science?
For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. — Romans 1:18-20