It needs adding, finally, that our recognition of intelligent and intentional expressions does not require us to understand everything about their source. We would have no difficulty distinguishing the significance of letters on a page from that of pebbles distributed on a sandy shore, even if we knew nothing about origins in either case. We can declare a functioning machine to be a designed object, whether or not we have any clue about who designed it. — Stephen L. Talbott, Nature Institute, May 17, 2016
Your site is great. I read it every day. Whoever is doing the writing and researching is a genius: witty, funny, insightful, informed and always right on....you make the darwinian farce look utterly laughable. Keep up the great work...I'll be tuned in. God Bless you! — a real estate investor in Texas
Peer review is touted as a demonstration of the self-critical nature of science. But it is a human system. Everybody involved brings prejudices, misunderstandings and gaps in knowledge, so no one should be surprised that peer review is often biased and inefficient. It is occasionally corrupt, sometimes a charade, an open temptation to plagiarists. Even with the best of intentions, how and whether peer review identifies high-quality science is unknown. It is, in short, unscientific. — Drummond Rennie, Nature 7/07/16

One of the most prominent scientific geniuses of the 17th century, Christiaan Huygens would be known as an “intelligent design” scientist if he lived today. Plants and animals are very different from inanimate matter, he argued, because “everything in them is so exactly adapted to some design, every part of them so fitted to its proper life, that they manifest an Infinite Wisdom.” Inventor of the pendulum clock and early proponent of the wave theory of light, Huygens was well-connected as a member of the Paris Academy, but rejected the rationalistic agnosticism in those circles. His prestige was commemorated on the Huygens Probe that landed on Saturn’s moon Titan in 2005, a moon that he had discovered 350 years earlier in 1655.
The tricks of the Darwin trade come out in force to explain these aquatic reptiles that evolutionists maintain came from land lizards.
June 19, 2014This explanation of Darwinian fitness from 10/29/2002 has been reformatted for the current website. It’s still worth considering.
August 4, 2017The Latest Episode in Evolving Origin-of-Life Stories by Dr Jerry Bergman The origin-of-life story is evolving. Before the middle 1600s most people believed that many forms of life originated by spontaneous generation from either inanimate matter, or once-living but now dead matter. Aristotle even believed that animals he considered “simple”, such as worms, fleas, bees, […]
FUNNY PAGES
See the DARWIN HYMNBOOK!
Sing along with our PARODY SONGS!
Laugh at our SCIENCE JOKES!
Below are a few of the original cartoons by Brett Miller that add humor to our articles. Some were commissioned especially for Creation-Evolution Headlines. Note: these are copyrighted artworks by Brett Miller, used here by permission.

Understand, you senseless among the people;
And you fools, when will you be wise?
He who planted the ear, shall He not hear?
He who formed the eye, shall He not see?
He who instructs the nations, shall He not correct,
He who teaches man knowledge?
The LORD knows the thoughts of man,
That they are futile. Psalm 94:8-11