We have already seen that distinguished scientists have accepted uncritically the questionable analogy between natural and artificial selection, and that they have often been undisturbed by the fallacies of the "tautology" and "deductive logic" formulations [see Ch. 2]. Such illogic survived and reproduced itself for the same reason that an apparently incompetent species sometimes avoids extinction; there was no effective competition in its ecological niche. — Phillip E. Johnson, Darwin on Trial (1991), pp. 28-29
I thank God for you and your contribution to His Kingdom. Yours is my favorite site.... We really appreciate your work. — a consultant in Virginia
The rule that science refuse teleology seems, therefore, less a requirement of science as such than a logical consequence of materialism: if materialism is true, then no fundamental or real teleology can exist in nature for science to study; instead, any teleology or intelligence in nature must result from underlying nonteleological processes. The question therefore arises whether nature, conceived in purely material terms, possesses the ability to create all the information that we find in it. — William Dembski, Being as Communion (2014), pp49-50
This is part 3 of Dr Henry Richter’s discussion on the requirements for life to exist on a planet elsewhere in the universe.
February 4, 2013Finding an article on a secular science site that criticizes the left and defends the right is so rare, it was news.
FUNNY PAGES
See the DARWIN HYMNBOOK!
Sing along with our PARODY SONGS!
Laugh at our SCIENCE JOKES!
Below are a few of the original cartoons by Brett Miller that add humor to our articles. Some were commissioned especially for Creation-Evolution Headlines. Note: these are copyrighted artworks by Brett Miller, used here by permission.

In that day man will have regard for his Maker, and his eyes will look to the Holy One of Israel. He will not have regard for the altars, the work of his hands, nor will he look to that which his fingers have made. — Isaiah 17:7-8