Dumbed-down media coverage has bred mistrust among some scientists, leading them to withdraw from what they regards as a media circus. Most, however, seem to be largely content with a system that disguises the very human process of scientific discovery as a seamless stream of ingenious and barely disputed ‘breakthroughs’ Like other elites, researchers feel no great yearning to be held to account by the press..... Science is being misrepresented as a cacophony of sometimes divergent but nonetheless definitive ‘findings’. — Colin Macilwain, Nature News, February 17, 2010
I have just recently started studying this science of God stuff with some degree of diligence and I am astonished at what I did not know and did not understand, despite my 58 years, and 4 Master’s Degrees, to include from an Ivy League school. Thank you for your efforts to get the true word out. — a reader in Alabama
The very idea that science best expresses its authority through consensus statements is at odds with a vibrant scientific enterprise. Consensus is for textbooks; real science depends for its progress on continual challenges to the current state of always-imperfect knowledge. Science would provide better value to politics if it articulated the broadest set of plausible interpretations, options and perspectives, imagined by the best experts, rather than forcing convergence to an allegedly unified voice. — Daniel Sarewitz, Nature, October 6, 2011

Is Christian philosophy good for science? In this series we showcase many examples, but the case could hardly be made stronger than to point to Mr. Scientific Method himself, Sir Francis Bacon.
Although not a practicing scientist, Bacon is considered by many historians to be the “founder of modern science.” His philosophy and writings were largely responsible for igniting the scientific revolution in the 17th century. Numerous intellectuals like Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton seized on the “new philosophy” of Bacon that emphasized empiricism and induction. Casting aside dependence on authorities like Aristotle, the new science exploded on the scene, yielding a wealth of discoveries and inventions that has continued unabated to this day. But this “new philosophy” was really nothing new; it was a return to the principles of the Bible. The “founder of modern science” was a Bible-believing Christian, and Christian doctrine was the foundation of his thinking.
Scientists have run out of options to keep Saturn and its rings and moons billions of years old. It’s time to face the music.
This is a continuation of my discussion on the requirements to allow life to exist on a planet elsewhere in the universe.
August 5, 2019When the coast is clear, and their careers are safe, some academics can afford to doubt Darwin publicly.
FUNNY PAGES
See the DARWIN HYMNBOOK!
Sing along with our PARODY SONGS!
Laugh at our SCIENCE JOKES!
Below are a few of the original cartoons by Brett Miller that add humor to our articles. Some were commissioned especially for Creation-Evolution Headlines. Note: these are copyrighted artworks by Brett Miller, used here by permission.

Worthy are You, our Lord and our God, to receive glory and honor and power; for You created all things, and because of Your will they existed, and were created. (Revelation 4:11)