Tokyo researcher develops the ‘AI Scientist’ that automates the entire scientific workflow for peer-reviewed article generation. We reflect on these developments from an ethical perspective.
An undergraduate class project, later published in a journal, ends up reinforcing evolutionary dogma, even while candidly admitting that ‘no one knows, from a scientific perspective, how life could have been formed from an early Earth that had no life.’
An 18‑month ethnographic study of AI therapy simulations exposes profound ethical breaches and systemic underperformance, underscoring that genuine human empathy cannot be reduced to mere syntax.