Should Big Science Blame the Public for Mistrust?
August 19, 2022
Look at what Big Science is doing. Then ask if the public is right to be wary of their claims.
VIEW HEADLINES ONLY
More Evidence Social Scientists Are Philosophical Dullards
May 17, 2022
Is it any surprise that the evolutionary theory of humanity corrupts clear thinking?
Evolutionary Biologists Aghast at Cultural Wokeism
December 9, 2021
They've suffered the evils of Cancel Culture, but what can they say about it? Culture evolves, too.
The Climate of Science and v.v.
September 10, 2021
The bluster of those speaking for science does not always match their objectivity.
Common Method for Evolutionary Inference Collapses
April 17, 2020
Evolutionists are going to be very upset over what this paper claims: phylogenetic trees of living animals are meaningless.
How to Accept Darwinism: Deny Reality
August 14, 2019
Darwinism makes the world an illusion. No wonder its teachers use deception to indoctrinate students.
Evolutionary Models Are Unreliable
August 3, 2019
Evolutionists find that models and assumptions in which they placed their trust are unreliable and unscientific.
Global Policies Can Trust Fake Science
January 30, 2019
Some matters are just too complicated to know with certainty. Here's another "whoops" moment in climate science.
Is Science Special?
April 3, 2017
Scientists are gathering this month to march – for what? How different is Big Science from any other special interest group making demands on the government?
Neanderthals Underestimated Again
May 27, 2016
Neanderthals show mental creativity for too long a period to support the evolutionary timeline.
Scientists Need Philosophers
October 26, 2014
Wise journal editors realize that they can't do science without philosophy.
Spin or Sin
November 1, 2011
You are bureau chief for a science news organization. Your job is to convince the public that science is right, and their doubts are wrong. You believe in reason and evidence, but you are frustrated that large segments of the population doubt the scientific consensus on certain hot-topic issues. The way to reach them, you say, is by coaxing people they already respect to convey the message, and use graphics to present the evidence. Sound reasonable?