VIEW HEADLINES ONLY

Natural Selection Is Catnip to Darwinians

The words put them in a state of euphoria, dreaming they have explained something when all they have said is "stuff happens."

Archive Classic: Neo-Darwinism Falsified in the Lab

This article from Odober 19, 2004 should be remembered because of its importance. Evolutionists ignored it.

Evolutionist Admits Darwin’s Connection to Racism

Although often ignored, some science organizations that embrace evolution acknowledge the close causative connection between Darwinism and racism.

Cancer Is Devolution

A major consortium examined 2,658 cancer genomes and found evolution going downward, not upward.

Genomics Shows Evolutionary Theory Is Baseless

New study reveals that evolution does not have a weak foundation: it has NO foundation.

Some Professionally-Safe Darwin Doubters Are Now Speaking Out

When the coast is clear, and their careers are safe, some academics can afford to doubt Darwin publicly.

If Diet and Drug Science Is Uncertain, How About Evolution?

Scientists blunder through advice on diet or medicine, but about molecules-to-man evolution they have no doubt whatsoever.

Autism: Another Example of Evolution Misleading Science with Tragic Results

Darwinians taught for decades that noncoding DNA consisted of evolutionary leftovers, but science is finding more and more functions in it.

Keynote Speech at Biology Conference Falsifies Major Claim of Darwinism

Keynote speaker receives a friendly welcome despite the grim implications of his mathematical derivations for Darwinian evolution.

Is It Becoming Safer to Doubt Darwin?

One recent secular news article leaves Darwin flailing without answers, but don't expect a revolution just yet.

Basener, Sanford Defend Paper Critiquing Fisher’s Theorem, II

Bill Basener and John Sanford recently critiqued Fisher's Theorem, a long-trusted model for neo-Darwinism. Two evolutionary geneticists responded. Here is Part II their counter-response.

Basener and Sanford Defend Paper Critiquing Fisher’s Theorem

Bill Basener and John Sanford recently critiqued Fisher's Theorem, a long-trusted model for neo-Darwinism. Two evolutionary geneticists responded. Here is Part I their counter-response.

NASA Promotes Natural Miracles

To know the vast improbabilities, and yet to leap over them with imaginary stories – that's deceiving the public.
Gregor Mendel, 1822 - 1884

Mathematician and Geneticist Team Up to Correct Fisher’s Theorem

A new paper corrects errors in Fisher's Theorem, a mathematical "proof" of Darwinism. Rather than supporting evolution, the corrected theorem inverts it.

Darwinians Claim to See Evolution Happening Now

Unable to see evolutionary progress in the fossil record, some Darwinians try to claim they are watching it before our eyes.
All Posts by Date