What is Normal? Subjectivity in Psychiatry Self-Destructs
September 20, 2024
A gay psychologist would not want to live in the world he promotes.
VIEW HEADLINES ONLY
More Evidence Social Scientists Are Philosophical Dullards
May 17, 2022
Is it any surprise that the evolutionary theory of humanity corrupts clear thinking?
Evolutionary Biologists Aghast at Cultural Wokeism
December 9, 2021
They've suffered the evils of Cancel Culture, but what can they say about it? Culture evolves, too.
Science Cannot Defend Moral Relativism
April 3, 2016
If morality evolves, then why do some scientists cast judgment?
Science Depends on Ethics
October 1, 2011
Naive reporters and textbook writers sometimes portray science as some kind of neutral, bias-free activity in which the “truth” about nature emerges on its own, as long as the scientist in the lily-white lab coat follows some kind of “scientific method.” Philosophers, theologians, ethicists and scientists with a background in any of these fields know better. One has to believe that truth about nature exists in order to seek for it. And one has to seek for it honestly. Many more examples of science’s ties to ethics or "moral philosophy" can be found, as a few recent articles show.