VIEW HEADLINES ONLY

What is Normal? Subjectivity in Psychiatry Self-Destructs

A gay psychologist would not want to live in the world he promotes.

More Evidence Social Scientists Are Philosophical Dullards

Is it any surprise that the evolutionary theory of humanity corrupts clear thinking?

Evolutionary Biologists Aghast at Cultural Wokeism

They've suffered the evils of Cancel Culture, but what can they say about it? Culture evolves, too.

Science Cannot Defend Moral Relativism

If morality evolves, then why do some scientists cast judgment?

Science Depends on Ethics

Naive reporters and textbook writers sometimes portray science as some kind of neutral, bias-free activity in which the “truth” about nature emerges on its own, as long as the scientist in the lily-white lab coat follows some kind of “scientific method.” Philosophers, theologians, ethicists and scientists with a background in any of these fields know better. One has to believe that truth about nature exists in order to seek for it. And one has to seek for it honestly. Many more examples of science’s ties to ethics or "moral philosophy" can be found, as a few recent articles show.
All Posts by Date
[archives type="yearly" cat_id="3960"]