VIEW HEADLINES ONLY

Mutations Are Not the Main Source of Genetic Variety for Evolution

New research study has created more problems for neo-Darwinism

Archive Classic: Neo-Darwinism Falsified in the Lab

This article from Odober 19, 2004 should be remembered because of its importance. Evolutionists ignored it.

Archive Classic: The Factor Darwin (and Malthus) Didn’t Consider

This entry from March 17, 2003 became inaccessible from the archives, but needs to be posted again because of its importance.

Natural Selection Is Vacuous, Says Evolutionist; Part II: Hidden Agency

Don't take our word for it that Natural Selection reduces to the Stuff Happens Law. Listen to an evolutionist say it.

Altruism Defeats Darwinism

Darwinism cannot handle pure altruism, but don't let scientists wander off into fake spirituality as an alternative.

Neutral Theory of Evolution Debunked

Dr Jerry Bergman elaborates on a proof in Michael Behe's new book that the neutral theory of evolution fails.

Darwin Debate Heats Up

Controversy surrounding Michael Behe's latest book is just the tip of the iceberg.

Darwin Given Credit for Non-Darwinian Observations

Darwinian evolution is one of the most curious scientific theories ever. Even un-Darwinian data can be twisted to support it.

Lizards Pre-Programmed to Adapt Their Coloration

Lizards put onto lava can change color within a week. Over time, the population blends into the darker environment.

No, These Findings Do Not Support Evolution

Evolutionary biologists keep giving Darwin credit for discoveries that actually militate against his theory.

Upsets Surprise Evolutionists

These announcements show that fossils have ways of contradicting evolutionary expectations.

New Version of Natural Selection Goes Mystical

Was there ever a song and dance as fantastical as W. Ford Doolittle's ITSNTS proposal?

Darwinians Cannot Agree on What Natural Selection Is

Controversies 159 years after Darwin have rendered his 'mechanism' a mystical idea, nebulous and incomprehensible. Has natural selection become the phlogiston of the 21st century?

Basener, Sanford Defend Paper Critiquing Fisher’s Theorem, II

Bill Basener and John Sanford recently critiqued Fisher's Theorem, a long-trusted model for neo-Darwinism. Two evolutionary geneticists responded. Here is Part II their counter-response.

Basener and Sanford Defend Paper Critiquing Fisher’s Theorem

Bill Basener and John Sanford recently critiqued Fisher's Theorem, a long-trusted model for neo-Darwinism. Two evolutionary geneticists responded. Here is Part I their counter-response.
All Posts by Date
[archives type="yearly" cat_id="4142"]