VIEW HEADLINES ONLY

Solving a Global Cultural Crisis Without Moral Authority

One cannot order scientists what not to do without appealing to a higher authority than man.

Natural Selection Is Vacuous, Says Evolutionist; Part II: Hidden Agency

Don't take our word for it that Natural Selection reduces to the Stuff Happens Law. Listen to an evolutionist say it.

No, Grandparents Are Not Products of Evolution

Is nothing sacred? Evolutionists try to explain grandparents by Darwinism, but run into conundrums —while dishonoring seniors.

Natural Selection: The Ghost Idol of Biology

A spirit that works in mysterious ways. Biologists cannot nail it down, but insist it can turn bacteria into biologists.

Natural Selection Is Useless, II: More Evidence

Continuing our discussion of whether natural selection has any value in science, we present more cases in the media.

Slimy Evolution Reporting Continues

Darwin gets credit for more things than his theory deserves, which is very little to begin with.

No Such Thing as Natural Election

On election day in America, both election and selection imply a chooser. Neither word applies in mindless nature.

Silly Evolution Speculations Would Cease If Media Allowed Fair Debate

Evolutionists get away with ridiculous stories because Big Science and Big Media are intolerant of opposing views. Healthy science requires open debate.

Keynote Speech at Biology Conference Falsifies Major Claim of Darwinism

Keynote speaker receives a friendly welcome despite the grim implications of his mathematical derivations for Darwinian evolution.

Religious People Have Better Fitness

Evolutionists have vague definitions of "fitness," but if physical and mental health are measures, then church-goers score high.

Basener, Sanford Defend Paper Critiquing Fisher’s Theorem, II

Bill Basener and John Sanford recently critiqued Fisher's Theorem, a long-trusted model for neo-Darwinism. Two evolutionary geneticists responded. Here is Part II their counter-response.

Basener and Sanford Defend Paper Critiquing Fisher’s Theorem

Bill Basener and John Sanford recently critiqued Fisher's Theorem, a long-trusted model for neo-Darwinism. Two evolutionary geneticists responded. Here is Part I their counter-response.
Gregor Mendel, 1822 - 1884

Mathematician and Geneticist Team Up to Correct Fisher’s Theorem

A new paper corrects errors in Fisher's Theorem, a mathematical "proof" of Darwinism. Rather than supporting evolution, the corrected theorem inverts it.

Can Human Evolution Survive Silly Storytelling?

One would think a scientist would be embarrassed to put forward such ideas. Why do Darwinists get away with it?

Excusing Darwinism’s Lack of Evidence

Several recent papers either rationalize evolution's failures, or else agree that the theory needs revision.
All Posts by Date