VIEW HEADLINES ONLY

Sexual Selection Comes Under Fire

From several fronts, new problems confront Darwin's other selection theory.

Darwinists Still Attempting to Prove Criminality is Genetic

  The idea that criminality represents a throwback to our pre-modern stage of human evolution, (i.e., to the innate aggressiveness of our survival-of-the-fittest animal ancestry) was disproved over a century ago. Shamefully, it’s back. by Jerry Bergman, PhD. Introduction Phrenology, the art of divining personality by evaluating bumps on the human head, is one of […]

Evolutionary Textbooks Promoted Racism

Biology textbooks played a significant role in promoting racism, but this embarrassing history is often ignored. Dr Jerry Bergman explains why.

Universities Scrub Names of Racist Leaders

The next step should be for the ACLU to acknowledge its racism.

Margaret Sanger Gets Cancelled

Finally, Darwin Disciple Margaret Sanger is exposed by the liberal media! But is it enough?

Evolutionist Admits Darwin’s Connection to Racism

Although often ignored, some science organizations that embrace evolution acknowledge the close causative connection between Darwinism and racism.

PBS Unmasks Darwinian Eugenics

Dr Jerry Bergman reviews the new PBS documentary on one of the evils of Darwinism, "The Eugenics Crusade."

Racism of Darwin and His Followers Exposed

A new documentary from the Discovery Institute exposes what evolutionists are trying to cover up: "scientific racism" by Darwinians.

Influential Evolutionist Fails to See His Own Contradictions

He trains philosophically-unsophisticated students with self-refuting ideas with the force of moral subjectivity.

Darwinism Produces Sociopathic Ideologies

Look at what some evolutionists are saying about the implications of their theory for human society.

Op-Ed: Time to Ditch Natural Selection?

CEH Editor questions whether 156 years of natural selection theory has produced anything of scientific, philosophical, or cultural value.

Political Science 101: Doubt Scientific Claims

Science goes through a chain of messengers from data to consumer. In between are fallible scientists, who speak often in incomprehensible jargon and often only partially understand what they observe, but often wish to gain notoriety with a major discovery (or need to publish or perish). Next, the institutional press offices decide what is significant and try to digest the jargon to layman level. The predigested stories are then delivered to science reporters, who sometimes sensationalize the filtered stories to make a name for themselves. Finally, the media outlets, prone to peer biases, dress up the products to grab the eyes of readers of their newspapers, magazines, or web pages. How much of the real scientific data remains at the end of this game of Telephone? Sometimes the bias is clearly evident, but often the product is delivered with all the presumptive authority of science. Once in awhile, a reporter comes clean about the dirty work involved.

Eugenics Documentary Opens at Holocaust Museum

Michael Ollove at the Baltimore Sun reports on a new exhibit at the U.S. Holocaust Museum entitled Deadly Medicine: Creating the Master Race.  The exhibit shows a 1937 Nazi propaganda film that invokes the law of natural selection as support for weeding out the unfit.  Ollove writes, The narrator declares that “we humans have sinned […]
All Posts by Date
[archives type="yearly" cat_id="2399"]