A Central Computer in our Cells
January 5, 2026
Rather than functioning as a simple on-off switch, TORC1 behaves as a highly integrated regulatory system.
VIEW HEADLINES ONLY
The Cosmos as Sacred Text
December 6, 2025
Materialism cannot account for mind without borrowing the very idealism it rejects.
The End of the Road for Materialism
December 4, 2025
Hegelian metaphysics in scientific notation: Materialism replaced by Mind
Consciousness: The Ghost in the Laboratory
November 5, 2025
The proliferation of theories reflects persistence to find an explanation for the one reality that refuses to be mechanized: the human self.
Three-Legged Lizards and the Limits of Evolutionary Storytelling
October 21, 2025
When the evidence refuses to behave, the Darwinian narrative expands to fit.
Consciousness Does Not Emerge; It Transcends
July 9, 2025
By what authority does science dismiss the existential status of consciousness, defining it away as an “emergent quality”?
A Tale of Two Worms: (R)Evolution on Trial in the Age of Genomics
June 27, 2025
Through two studies about worms, we see a conceptual crisis in evolutionary biology.
As the Worm Turns, Evolution Leaps
June 24, 2025
Researchers don't see gradualism in earthworm evolution, so they resort to evolutionary leaps instead.
How Secular Science Deceives Itself
June 6, 2025
Like a muddied spring or a polluted fountain is a righteous man who gives way before the wicked (Proverbs 25:26).
Why Darwinism Is Fundamentally Irrational
May 8, 2025
Hegel's Dialectic leads Darwinian materialists to embrace contradictions – not as a bug, but as a feature.
Science and Scientism Are Two Different Things
December 15, 2021
A Scientist Condemns Scientism, or why many scientists wrongly confuse science with scientism.
You Are Free to Read This
September 18, 2016
The question of free will tantalizes philosophers, because the mind-brain distinction is complex.
Exploring the Malleability of Evolutionary Explanation
January 23, 2009
Is evolutionary theory just a very malleable and ductile idea, able to adapt to changing observations, or should it be described as a strong theory, powerful in its explanatory breadth?