VIEW HEADLINES ONLY

How Secular Science Deceives Itself

Like a muddied spring or a polluted fountainĀ is a righteous man who gives way before the wicked (Proverbs 25:26).

The Science of Being Wrong

In a process of continual correction, when does one get to certainty?

Scientism Moves into Speculative Fantasyland

Abandoning rigor, the Big Science Cartel and its promoters in the media turn goofy.

Researchers, Stop Kowtowing to the Darwin Party

It's not necessary to say that the biological system you're studying "evolved." Drop the habit and your science will improve.

Big Science Embraces Disinformation

If it's for the common good, lying and manipulating the public is justified, say leftist totalitarians in academia.

Big Science Is Failing Scientists

"Scientific" institutions are little more than powerful bureacracies enriching themselves and keeping researchers in line.

Big Science Intensifying Indoctrination

Big Science has long excused indoctrination, but now they are going all in for "interventions" targeting non-consensus views.

Big Science Spreading Climate Disinformation

Three kinds of deliberate misinformation (i.e., disinformation) are being spread by Big Science and Big Media.

Big Science Goes All in for Abortion

Big Science as a special interest group favors abortion, but biological science favors life.

Darwinism Undermines Values

The Social Darwinists preached a dog-eat-dog society. What are Darwinists preaching today? The same thing.

Trusting Science Is Not the Same as Critical Thinking

Experiments with participants given fake science show that those who "trust science" can be gullible.

Who Decides What Is Misinformation About Science?

Can scientists recognize their own fallibility? Must they portray themselves as judges over the public?

Fact-Checking Requires Biblical Morality

How does a materialist gain the right to combat misinformation from a Darwinian process?

Pandemic? Ignore Evolution

Evolutionists are trying to sneak Darwin into another field where he doesn't belong.

Evolutionists Manhandle Contrary Evidence to Support Darwinism

How can one mangle evidence for no change or abrupt appearance in order to make a case for evolution? Darwinians do it all the time.
All Posts by Date
[archives type="yearly" cat_id="7827"]