What Do a Toucan, an Oyster and a Spider Have in Common? Bio-Engineers’ Drool

Posted on February 17, 2013 in Amazing Facts, Biomimetics, Birds, Cell Biology, Genetics, Intelligent Design, Mammals, Marine Biology, Philosophy of Science, Terrestrial Zoology

If we want to build more robust, lightweight materials, two researchers say, look to nature.

In Science, Meyers and McKittrick, who have been in the biomimetics field for a decade (see PhysOrg), laid out the design specs for new artificial materials inspired by animals.

Spider silk is extraordinarily strong, mollusk shells and bone are tough, and porcupine quills and feathers resist buckling. How are these notable properties achieved? The building blocks of the materials listed above are primarily minerals and biopolymers, mostly in combination; the first weak in tension and the second weak in compression. The intricate and ingenious hierarchical structures are responsible for the outstanding performance of each material. Toughness is conferred by the presence of controlled interfacial features (friction, hydrogen bonds, chain straightening and stretching); buckling resistance can be achieved by filling a slender column with a lightweight foam. Here, we present and interpret selected examples of these and other biological materials. Structural bio-inspired materials design makes use of the biological structures by inserting synthetic materials and processes that augment the structures’ capability while retaining their essential features. In this Review, we explain this idea through some unusual concepts.

Meyers & McKittrick delineated the following challenges for materials engineers: self assembly, multi-functionality, hierarchy, hydration, mild synthesis conditions (e.g., room temperature), optimization, and self-healing.  For inspiration, they looked to the beak of the toucan, the feathers of birds, oyster shells, spider silk, porcupine quills, and the skulls of longhorn cowfish.  Strong, lightweight, durable – life has mastered all seven design specifications.  Engineers don’t have to use proteins as long as they follow the methods used in nature.  “Mother Nature gives us templates,” said McKittrick. “We are trying to understand them better so we can implement them in new materials.

Meyers pointed out that biomimetics has a long history.  “Bio-inspired designs have been a part of science and engineering for a long time—from the legend of Icarus, to Leonardo Da Vinci’s flying machines, inspired by birds, to modern-day materials such as Velcro, Meyers pointed out” in PhysOrg.  Only in the last decade or so has the field really taken off, with new research labs, journals and dramatic successes with more on the way all the time.

In other Biomimetics news, (1) Science discussed efforts to copy what microbes do so easily—splitting hydrogen molecules.  Hydrogenase enzymes are the envy of fuel cell designers but molecular biologists still don’t know quite how they work so effectively at room temperature.  (2) PNAS featured “Biomimetic Buildings” in a review that is part engineering, part art, and part Thoreau.  Architect Charles Lee’s exhibit of a biomimetic house is currently on tour as part of exhibition entitled Nature’s Toolbox: Biodiversity, Art, and Invention.  (3) Finally, Science Daily talked about “Cell Circuits Remember Their History: Engineers Design New Synthetic Biology Circuits That Combine Memory and Logic.”  By building logic circuits in the genes of bacteria, MIT researchers hope to create “long-term environmental sensors, efficient controls for biomanufacturing, or to program stem cells to differentiate into other cell types.”

The future is in biomimetics, not Darwinism.  The quaint Victorian myth has no place in this exploding field.  Get with the program, Charlie worshippers; it’s all about design now.

 

3 Comments

Yah Coyote February 17, 2013

I wondered why Materials Science had lacked Civil, Mechanical, Electrical Engineering abvances in the Twentieth Century. Is it evolution theory was the blockage? I had heard of the spider’s silk long ago, but guess the synthetics never matched the performance. Now as we near what Gabriel told Daniel was the “time of the end”, the fabulous possibilities of advanced materials will unfortunately only have a short time to produce the wondrous products that will enthrall us like the technolgy explosion of the 1930s did to our Grandparents.

rockyway February 17, 2013

1. “The intricate and ingenious hierarchical structures are responsible for the outstanding performance of each material.”

- In not too long a time from now we’re going to have a civilization heavily influenced by design taken from creation; a creation inspired civilization if you will. If things go on as they are we will have a Design based technology and an anti-creationist elite running the sciences. This might be an irony to end all ironies.

2. “Mother Nature gives us templates,” said McKittrick. “We are trying to understand them better so we can implement them in new materials.”

- Why is it ”scientific” (or at least acceptable) to talk about ”Mother Nature” but it’s not okay to speak of the Creator? “Nature” has been divinized (or redivinized) in our day; given all the creative attributes of the Creator.

3. “Bio-inspired designs have been a part of science and engineering for a long time…”

— One thing that materialists have never been able to adequately explain is why it is that blind, mindless, random, physical processes can supposedly ”create” wonders well beyond any ability by human intelligence. This alone was enough for me to lean toward an ID perspective on things.

Thomas Nagel (Mind and Cosmos) has concluded that undirected chance cannot account for design in the biosphere, but he imagines that some yet undiscovered law will be found that accounts for it. I can’t imagine this happening, as creativity utterly transcends law-like necessity.

Robert Byers February 17, 2013

If evolution was true then they would not expect like results from like causes.
If a creator is behind the common blueprint of nature one would expect like results for like needs.
It seems nature has good ideas for us because it is the result of a good idea and not chance.
I recently learned the battery was created , 17–1800-s, by observing electric fish.

Leave a Reply