Darwinian theory is a remarkably inappropriate model, metaphor, inspiration or theoretical framework for economic theory. The theory of natural selection shares few of its strengths and most of its weaknesses with neoclassical theory, and provides no help in any attempt to frame more powerful alternatives to that theory. — Alexander Rosenberg, 2000
I love your site! I **really** enjoy reading it for several specific reasons: 1. It uses the latest (as in this month!) research as a launch pad for opinion; for years I have searched for this from a creation science viewpoint, and now, I’ve found it. 2. You have balanced fun with this topic. This is hugely valuable! Smug Christianity is ugly, and I don’t perceive that attitude in your comments. 3. I enjoy the expansive breadth of scientific news that you cover. 4. I am not a trained scientist but I know evolutionary bologna/(boloney) when I see it; you help me to see it. I really appreciate this. — a computer technology salesman in Virginia
The curious thing, however, was that within a few decades, and in defiance of each and every scientific imprecation, Darwin’s Origin achieved the acceptance initially denied it by the scientific community. Such a puzzling reversal of fortunes clearly cries out for explanation since, on the face of it, it seems as counterintuitive as if, say, a Broadway production panned by the critics were later to receive a “Greatest Show on Earth” award. — Neil Thomas,nbsp;author of Taking Leave of Darwin

Is Christian philosophy good for science? In this series we showcase many examples, but the case could hardly be made stronger than to point to Mr. Scientific Method himself, Sir Francis Bacon.
Although not a practicing scientist, Bacon is considered by many historians to be the “founder of modern science.” His philosophy and writings were largely responsible for igniting the scientific revolution in the 17th century. Numerous intellectuals like Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton seized on the “new philosophy” of Bacon that emphasized empiricism and induction. Casting aside dependence on authorities like Aristotle, the new science exploded on the scene, yielding a wealth of discoveries and inventions that has continued unabated to this day. But this “new philosophy” was really nothing new; it was a return to the principles of the Bible. The “founder of modern science” was a Bible-believing Christian, and Christian doctrine was the foundation of his thinking.
Now that DVDs are disappearing, Illustra Media has decided to put most of its high quality material online without cost, supported by donations and subscriptions.
June 19, 2014This explanation of Darwinian fitness from 10/29/2002 has been reformatted for the current website. It’s still worth considering.
August 13, 2017If atheists think they can be just as moral as religious people, see what they think of other atheists.
FUNNY PAGES
See the DARWIN HYMNBOOK!
Sing along with our PARODY SONGS!
Laugh at our SCIENCE JOKES!
Below are a few of the original cartoons by Brett Miller that add humor to our articles. Some were commissioned especially for Creation-Evolution Headlines. Note: these are copyrighted artworks by Brett Miller, used here by permission.

They sacrificed to demons, not to God, to gods they did not know, to new gods, new arrivals that your fathers did not fear. Of the Rock who begot you, you are unmindful, and have forgotten the God who fathered you. — Deuteronomy 32:17-18