Consensus can be more robust than the data it rests on. That's true in Darwinism, and appears to be true in climate science, according to some published doubts.
The leftist agenda of most science journalists forces them to oppose conservatism, no matter how twisted their logic becomes. Why would anyone trust them about Darwinism?
Scientists are gathering this month to march – for what? How different is Big Science from any other special interest group making demands on the government?
Have they no shame? Science is not supposed to take political positions. What they're doing this week undermines their credibility as unbiased seekers of the truth.
It's still dangerous to challenge Big Science about climate change. In the new political climate, a growing number of voices are willing to take the risk.