Darwinist Clickbait Writers Have Gone Insane
They know ID is on the rise.
They know public trust in science
has plummeted. But they do it anyway.
Some politically conservative news reporters have noted with humor how certain DEI “Woke” leftists feel obsessed with taking the 20% side of 80-20 issues. These leftists know that their views are wildly unpopular but that only seems to push them even farther left, chanting, singing silly jingles off-key, and more recently, screaming into microphones with profanity. It’s like a mental illness. One would think that rational people in such a situation would take stock of their position, learn why their opposition is so successful, and seek to understand why they are being ineffective with their messaging. They might even question if they are lacking in common sense.
Well, those leftists can’t even compete with the Darwinists. Look at some recent headlines that Darwinist reporters say in all seriousness, expecting their readers to purr, “Ah, science. Isn’t it wonderful.”
Scientists may have found the tiny DNA switch that made us human (UC San Diego via Science Daily, 15 Aug 2025). We can’t rule out that this joke of a headline was written by AI or a hoaxer, but assuming it was written intentionally by a pro-Darwin reporter, here’s the upshot: you are a human by mistake. One day, a mutation in a chimp brain turned on a cascade of mutations that sent brain cells proliferating out of control. The crowded chimp skull didn’t explode; it turned into Einstein. Seriously. A transcriptional enhancer named HAR123 made us what we are today! Celebrate the creative power of mistakes! Sensible people are chuckling har-dee-har-har over that one.
Ultimately, HAR123 promotes a particularly advanced human trait called cognitive flexibility, or the ability to unlearn and replace previous knowledge.
In addition to providing new insights into the biology of the human brain, the results also offer a molecular explanation [i.e., a godless materialist story] for some of the radical changes that have occurred in the human brain over the course of our evolution. This is supported, for example, by the authors’ finding that the human version of HAR123 exerts different molecular and cellular effects than the chimpanzee version in both stem cells and neuron precursor cells in a petri dish.
Presumably these geniuses had to look busy between shots of Darwhisky. Can you believe it? Let’s think about this (with our minds, not with our molecules). If HAR123 is like a blind, broken volume control knob creating brain cells, what guided it on a path to intelligence, rationality, consciousness, cognition, creativity and personality? Wouldn’t it be like the out-of-control broomstick in The Sorcerer’s Apprentice? Those conservative news reporters often say in disbelief at DEI craziness what fits here: “You can’t make this stuff up.”
Weird microbial partnership shows how complex life may have evolved (New Scientist, 15 August 2025). One day a bacterium walked into a bar and hooked up with an archaea. It was the start of a beautiful relationship that made us what we are today. Use your imagination and visualize this romance:
Microbes from a remote bay in Western Australia seem to connect to each other with tiny tubes, forming a relationship that may reflect an early step in the evolution of complex life.
We’ll agree with the reporter on this one. It’s weird.
New “evolution engine” creates super-proteins 100,000x faster (Scripps Institute via Science Daily, 8 Aug 2025). When will they ever learn? This is not evolution; it’s intelligent design!
This could help scientists more rapidly evolve antibodies to target specific cancers, evolve more effective therapeutic enzymes, and design proteases that target proteins involved in cancer and neurodegenerative disease.
“What’s exciting is that it’s not limited to one disease or one kind of protein,” says Diercks. “Because the system is customizable, you can drop in any gene and evolve it toward whatever function you need.“
Critics of Darwinism have pointed out this error since Darwin was alive, but it goes on. Targets? Design? Function? This is impossible in Darwinian evolution, which is blind, aimless, purposeless, and doesn’t care a whit what happens. How do you define insanity? Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. No; we critics will not let them get away with it.
The Great Apes’ Guide to Human Nature (USC Dornsife, 18 June 2025). In case you haven’t noticed, humans study ape nature, not vice versa. Professor Craig Stanford at USC has spent three decades studying apes. That’s fine in and of itself (apes are interesting, and worth studying). But Dr Stanford and his reporter accomplice Daniel Smith have not learned that lying is immoral.
Humans share upwards of 98% of their DNA with the great apes — gorillas, chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans — and Stanford, a professor of biological sciences and anthropology, looks to the nonhuman primates for insights into human evolution and the origins of our behavior.
The 98% figure is false. Did Dr Stanford learn to lie by watching deceptive behavior in apes? Is he aping their behavior? If his behavior and morals are grounded in ape evolution, then his views have no credibility.
This gets so tiring. We have to keep up the pressure on these DODOs. They mislead the public, censor their critics, and give everyone a pseudoscientific license to act like beasts.
For relief, watch Alma Deutscher compose a piano sonata from four random notes chosen by the audience. Did that have its roots in ape behavior? Then read the biography of Leonhard Euler. Evolve those brains, Darwinist.