An 18‑month ethnographic study of AI therapy simulations exposes profound ethical breaches and systemic underperformance, underscoring that genuine human empathy cannot be reduced to mere syntax.
Scientists have uncovered evidence of what they describe as “prehistoric mathematical thinking” in early Mesopotamian art, challenging long‑held assumptions about the gradual evolution of human knowledge.
Here we see yet another case of researchers viewing reality through evolutionary glasses, leading to bold interpolations well beyond the actual evidence.
Either reality is given, spoken, and capable of correcting us, or it is an emergent consensus generated by process itself. There is no third alternative.